A few-shot disease diagnosis decision making model based on meta-learning for general practice.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors have become the biggest threat to the safety of patients in primary health care. General practitioners, as the "gatekeepers" of primary health care, have a responsibility to accurately diagnose patients. However, many general practitioners have insufficient knowledge and clinical experience in some diseases. Clinical decision making tools need to be developed to effectively improve the diagnostic process in primary health care. The long-tailed class distributions of medical datasets are challenging for many popular decision making models based on deep learning, which have difficulty predicting few-shot diseases. Meta-learning is a new strategy for solving few-shot problems. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, a few-shot disease diagnosis decision making model based on a model-agnostic meta-learning algorithm (FSDD-MAML) is proposed. The MAML algorithm is applied in a knowledge graph-based disease diagnosis model to find the optimal model parameters. Moreover, FSDD-MAML can learn learning rates for all modules of the knowledge graph-based disease diagnosis model. For n-way, k-shot learning tasks, the inner loop of FSDD-MAML performs multiple gradient update steps to learn internal features in disease classification tasks using n×k examples, and the outer loop of FSDD-MAML optimizes the meta-objective to find the associated optimal parameters and learning rates. FSDD-MAML is compared with the original knowledge graph-based disease diagnosis model and other meta-learning algorithms based on an abdominal disease dataset. RESULT: Meta-learning algorithms can greatly improve the performance of models in top-1 evaluation compared with top-3, top-5, and top-10 evaluations. The proposed decision making model FSDD-MAML outperforms all the other models, with a precision@1 of 90.02 %. We achieve state-of-the-art performance in the diagnosis of all diseases, and the prediction performance for few-shot diseases is greatly improved. For the two groups with the fewest examples of diseases, FSDD-MAML achieves relative increases in precision@1 of 29.13 % and 21.63 % compared with the original knowledge graph-based disease diagnosis model. In addition, we analyze the reasoning process of several few-shot disease predictions and provide an explanation for the results. CONCLUSION: The decision making model based on meta-learning proposed in this paper can support the rapid diagnosis of diseases in general practice and is especially capable of helping general practitioners diagnose few-shot diseases. This study is of profound significance for the exploration and application of meta-learning to few-shot disease assessment in general practice.

An Explainable and Personalized Cognitive Reasoning Model Based on Knowledge Graph: Toward Decision Making for General Practice.

General practice plays a prominent role in primary health care (PHC). However, evidence has shown that the quality of PHC is still unsatisfactory, and the accuracy of clinical diagnosis and treatment must be improved in China. Decision making tools based on artificial intelligence can help general practitioners diagnose diseases, but most existing research is not sufficiently scalable and explainable. An explainable and personalized cognitive reasoning model based on knowledge graph (CRKG) proposed in this article can provide personalized diagnosis, perform decision making in general practice, and simulate the mode of thinking of human beings utilizing patients' electronic health records (EHRs) and knowledge graph. Taking abdominal diseases as the application point, an abdominal disease knowledge graph is first constructed in a semiautomated manner. Then, the CRKG designed referring to dual process theory in cognitive science involves the update strategy of global graph representations and reasoning on a personal cognitive graph by adopting the idea of graph neural networks and attention mechanisms. For the diagnosis of diseases in general practice, the CRKG outperforms all the baselines with a precision@1 of 0.7873, recall@10 of 0.9020 and hits@10 of 0.9340. Additionally, the visualization of the reasoning process for each visit of a patient based on the knowledge graph enhances clinicians' comprehension and contributes to explainability. This study is of great importance for the exploration and application of decision making based on EHRs and knowledge graph.

Causal knowledge graph construction and evaluation for clinical decision support of diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Many important clinical decisions require causal knowledge (CK) to take action. Although many causal knowledge bases for medicine have been constructed, a comprehensive evaluation based on real-world data and methods for handling potential knowledge noise are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study are threefold: (1) propose a framework for the construction of a large-scale and high-quality causal knowledge graph (CKG); (2) design the methods for knowledge noise reduction to improve the quality of the CKG; (3) evaluate the knowledge completeness and accuracy of the CKG using real-world data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We extracted causal triples from three knowledge sources (SemMedDB, UpToDate and Churchill's Pocketbook of Differential Diagnosis) based on rule methods and language models, performed ontological encoding, and then designed semantic modeling between electronic health record (EHR) data and the CKG to complete knowledge instantiation. We proposed two graph pruning strategies (co-occurrence ratio and causality ratio) to reduce the potential noise introduced by SemMedDB. Finally, the evaluation was carried out by taking the diagnostic decision support (DDS) of diabetic nephropathy (DN) as a real-world case. The data originated from a Chinese hospital EHR system from October 2010 to October 2020. The knowledge completeness and accuracy of the CKG were evaluated based on three state-of-the-art embedding methods (R-GCN, MHGRN and MedPath), the annotated clinical text and the expert review, respectively. RESULTS: This graph included 153,289 concepts and 1,719,968 causal triples. A total of 1427 inpatient data were used for evaluation. Better results were achieved by combining three knowledge sources than using only SemMedDB (three models: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): p < 0.01, F1: p < 0.01), and the graph covered 93.9 % of the causal relations between diseases and diagnostic evidence recorded in clinical text. Causal relations played a vital role in all relations related to disease progression for DDS of DN (three models: AUC: p > 0.05, F1: p > 0.05), and after pruning, the knowledge accuracy of the CKG was significantly improved (three models: AUC: p < 0.01, F1: p < 0.01; expert review: average accuracy: + 5.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that our proposed CKG could completely and accurately capture the abstract CK under the concrete EHR data, and the pruning strategies could improve the knowledge accuracy of our CKG. The CKG has the potential to be applied to the DDS of diseases.

EHR-Oriented Knowledge Graph System: Toward Efficient Utilization of Non-Used Information Buried in Routine Clinical Practice.

Non-used clinical information has negative implications on healthcare quality. Clinicians pay priority attention to clinical information relevant to their specialties during routine clinical practices but may be insensitive or less concerned about information showing disease risks beyond their specialties, resulting in delayed and missed diagnoses or improper management. In this study, we introduced an electronic health record (EHR)-oriented knowledge graph system to efficiently utilize non-used information buried in EHRs. EHR data were transformed into a semantic patient-centralized information model under the ontology structure of a knowledge graph. The knowledge graph then creates an EHR data trajectory and performs reasoning through semantic rules to identify important clinical findings within EHR data. A graphical reasoning pathway illustrates the reasoning footage and explains the clinical significance for clinicians to better understand the neglected information. An application study was performed to evaluate unconsidered chronic kidney disease (CKD) reminding for non-nephrology clinicians to identify important neglected information. The study covered 71,679 patients in non-nephrology departments. The system identified 2,774 patients meeting CKD diagnosis criteria and 10,377 patients requiring high attention. A follow-up study of 5,439 patients showed that 82.1% of patients who met the diagnosis criteria and 61.4% of patients requiring high attention were confirmed to be CKD positive during follow-up research. The application demonstrated that the proposed approach is feasible and effective in clinical information utilization. Additionally, it's valuable as an explainable artificial intelligence to provide interpretable recommendations for specialist physicians to understand the importance of non-used data and make comprehensive decisions.